All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC] clvmd: verify messages before processing
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:31:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130731153111.GB12539@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F8CBD3.9090201@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:33:23AM +0100, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> >@@ -2189,10 +2286,22 @@ error:
> >  void process_message(struct local_client *client, char *buf, int len,
> >  		     const char *csid)
> >  {
> >+	char nodename[max_cluster_member_name_len];
> >  	struct clvm_header *inheader;
> >+	int rv;
> >
> >  	inheader = (struct clvm_header *) buf;
> >  	ntoh_clvm(inheader);	/* Byteswap fields */
> >+
> >+	rv = verify_message(buf, len);
> >+	if (rv < 0) {
> >+		memset(nodename, 0, sizeof(nodename));
> >+		clops->name_from_csid(csid, nodename);
> >+		log_error("process_message from %s len %d bad verify\n", nodename, len);
> >+		dump_message(buf, len);
> 
> Here you will probably have to return an error to the calling clvmd
> or you will get delays when the caller times out. If that happens
> then the 'timed-out' message is less than helpful

The thinking behind no reply was that if a command sends a bogus message,
it doesn't deserve a reply, and even if it got one, may not handle it
properly anyway.  So, if we're dealing with a bogus non-message, I think
we're beyond the point where we can be helpful.  I'm mainly trying to just
protect clvmd from faulty commands.  But, I looked at how feasible it
would be, and I don't think it's worth the trouble -- we'd have to do the
whole add_to_lvmqueue() thing, etc.




  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-31 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-30 19:46 [PATCH RFC] clvmd: verify messages before processing David Teigland
2013-07-31  8:33 ` Christine Caulfield
2013-07-31 15:31   ` David Teigland [this message]
2013-08-01  9:13     ` Christine Caulfield

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130731153111.GB12539@redhat.com \
    --to=teigland@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.