All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/powernv: Pick up correct number of PEs
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:24:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130801042446.GA5540@shangw.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375262326.3743.4.camel@pasglop>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:18:46PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 16:47 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> Usually, the property "ibm,opal-num-pes" of PHB dev-tree node
>> indicates the number of total PEs. If that property isn't existing
>> or valid, we should fall back to pick the correct number of total
>> PEs according to PHB type: IODA1 or IODA2.
>
>Is that correct ? Don't we get the total number of PEs from a config
>register on the bridge ? I didn't think the IODA architecture specified
>the total number of PE of a given implementation...
>

For now, the firmware has fixed values (1/128/256), which isn't figured
out from EEH capability register. That might be something to do later
for the f/w.

>For example, does Torrent implement 128 ?
>

I don't know what's "Torrent" :-)

>I'd rather stick to safe here, if the firmware doesn't say, just use
>one.
>
>Now some of the PHB registers are actually architected in IODA afaik, so
>we could just go look but let's not make a precedent here.
>

Ok. Thanks, Ben. Please drop this one :-)

Thanks,
Gavin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-01  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31  8:47 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/powernv: Free PHB instance upon error Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/powernv: Fetch PHB bus range from dev-tree Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/powernv: Check primary PHB through ID Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/powernv: Pick up correct number of PEs Gavin Shan
2013-07-31  9:18   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-01  4:24     ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2013-08-01  4:42       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-31  8:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/powernv: Needn't IO segment map for PHB3 Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='20130801042446.GA5540@shangw.(null)' \
    --to=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.