All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, davej@redhat.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, glommer@parallels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] bdi: add a new writeback list for sync
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:59:31 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130801055931.GP7118@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130731151114.GG22930@quack.suse.cz>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:11:14PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 31-07-13 14:15:45, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >  /*
> > + * mark an inode as under writeback on the given bdi
> > + */
> > +void bdi_mark_inode_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(bdi != inode_to_bdi(inode));
> > +	if (list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list)) {
> > +		spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +		if (list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list))
> > +			list_add_tail(&inode->i_wb_list, &bdi->wb.b_writeback);
> > +		spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * clear an inode as under writeback on the given bdi
> > + */
> > +static void bdi_clear_inode_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> > +				      struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(bdi != inode_to_bdi(inode));
> > +	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list)) {
> > +		spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +		list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> > +		spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +	}
> > +}
>   Umm, are these list_empty() checks without lock really safe?

I think they are.....

>   Looking into
> the code in more detail, it seems that mapping->tree_lock saves us from
> races between insert & removal but it definitely deserves a comment (or maybe
> even an assertion) that the function requires it.
> bdi_clear_inode_writeback() is safe only because it is called only when the
> inode is practically dead. Again, I think it deserves a comment...

Ok.

> > @@ -1264,9 +1330,21 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
> >  
> >  		cond_resched();
> >  
> > -		spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
> > +                /*
> > +                 * the inode has been written back now, so check whether we
> > +                 * still have pages under IO and move it back to the primary
> > +                 * list if necessary
> > +                 */
> > +                spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> > +                spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> > +                if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK)) {
> > +                        WARN_ON(list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list));
> > +                        list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &bdi->wb.b_writeback);
> > +                } else
> > +			list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> > +                spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>   Whitespace is damaged in the above hunk...

Bizarre. I'll fix it.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-01  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31  4:15 [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 01/11] writeback: plug writeback at a high level Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:40   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  5:48     ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  8:34       ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] inode: add IOP_NOTHASHED to avoid inode hash lock in evict Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:44   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  8:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-02  1:11     ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-02 14:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 03/11] inode: convert inode_sb_list_lock to per-sb Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:48   ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] sync: serialise per-superblock sync operations Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:12   ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:51   ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] bdi: add a new writeback list for sync Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:11   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  5:59     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: periodically trim the writeback list Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:15   ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01  6:16     ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  9:03       ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] inode: convert per-sb inode list to a list_lru Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  8:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-02  1:06     ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: Use RCU lookups for inode cache Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] list_lru: don't need node lock in list_lru_count_node Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  4:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] list_lru: don't lock during add/del if unnecessary Dave Chinner
2013-07-31  6:48 ` [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements Sedat Dilek
2013-08-01  6:19   ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01  6:31     ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130801055931.GP7118@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.