From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:31:25 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] host-gettext build failure (emacs dependency?)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LVsJ6uZbeiRPHcru+Q0J8J2+Xn5ixsTCe4LNZpOm1e67Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAXf6LVsJ6uZbeiRPHcru+Q0J8J2+Xn5ixsTCe4LNZpOm1e67Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130801163125.142e2fce@skate>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Dear Thomas De Schampheleire,

On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:58:06 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:

> But more generally, I wonder why host-gettext needs/uses emacs at all.
> The target gettext already disables several things:
> GETTEXT_CONF_OPT += \
>         --disable-libasprintf \
>         --disable-acl \
>         --disable-openmp \
>         --disable-rpath \
>         --disable-java \
>         --disable-native-java \
>         --disable-csharp \
>         --disable-relocatable \
>         --without-emacs
> 
> but the host-gettext seems to be full. Do we really need e.g. emacs
> support for host-gettext? What about csharp, java, native-java?

Hum:

HOST_GETTEXT_CONF_OPT = \
        --disable-libasprintf \
        --disable-acl \
        --disable-openmp \
        --disable-rpath \
        --disable-java \
        --disable-native-java \
        --disable-csharp \
        --disable-relocatable \
        --without-emacs

So we also disable Emacs support and lots of other stuff.

I guess you don't have 0d4133edfedd8ca641db39d3eec9dc7146c8fa4e, which
has been merged post 2013.05.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com