From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: final fixes for events and some
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:32:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130805143257.GA32639@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375712355.22073.45.camel@gandalf.local.home>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Oleg Nesterov has been working hard in closing all the holes that can
> lead to race conditions between deleting an event and accessing an event
> debugfs file. This included a fix to the debugfs system (acked by Greg
> Kroah-Hartman). We think that all the holes have been patched and
> hopefully we don't find more. I haven't marked all of them for stable
> because I need to examine them more to figure out how far back some of
> the changes need to go.
Sigh, that's quite some churn still - unless these bugs were introduced in
the v3.11 merge window (i.e. are genuine _regressions_), shouldn't such
invasive fixes really go into v3.12 instead?
I see that some of the fixes here fix issues that your earlier post-rc1
rounds of non-regression fixes introduced to begin with. That's really not
a good pattern either IMO.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-05 14:19 [GIT PULL] tracing: final fixes for events and some Steven Rostedt
2013-08-05 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-08-05 14:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-12 18:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-13 2:39 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-13 3:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-13 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-13 11:45 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-13 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130805143257.GA32639@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.