From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877D02C00BE for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 06:03:33 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 22:03:23 +0200 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: Peter LaDow Subject: Re: Failure to detect PCI card Message-ID: <20130806220323.09f88389@crub> In-Reply-To: References: <20130805202559.0086e806@crub> <52000ACA.1010606@ovro.caltech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Hawkins List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:14:29 -0700 Peter LaDow wrote: ... > Perhaps it is a BIOS option ROM like you suggested earlier. The > 3c90xC reference manual I found > (http://people.freebsd.org/~wpaul/3Com/3c90xc.pdf) mentions an option > ROM (and there is an Atmel part stuffed). I can't find any technical > information on the FA331 (yet), so I don't know about it. > > But regardless, wouldn't enumeration have to occur before any option > ROM could even be used? Yes. If the device didn't respond with its Device- and Vendor-ID when reading its configuration space, then it cannot be configured and reading the expansion ROM won't work. Thanks, Anatolij