From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:45935 "EHLO mail-bk0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757206Ab3HGHAA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2013 03:00:00 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id mz10so443843bkb.17 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 23:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 08:59:56 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: Jason Cooper Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Lior Amsalem , Maen Suleiman , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ezequiel Garcia Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/13] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver Message-ID: <20130807065954.GA22906@manwe> References: <1375363516-2620-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130806200256.GB19280@titan.lakedaemon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" In-Reply-To: <20130806200256.GB19280@titan.lakedaemon.net> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:02:56PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > Thomas, >=20 > In order to get some testing in -next, I've *tentatively* applied this > series in the following way: >=20 > +---+ mvebu/msi_common (1,2,3,10) > | > +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (4-9) > | > +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (11-13) >=20 > I had to make one change to patch #9, I protected the last two blocks > with #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI to prevent a build failure at that point. >=20 > mvebu/msi_common should be appropriate for Thierry to base off, however, > I make no guarantees about the stability of the branch until I send a > PR for it. Code-wise, it should be fine, but the commit-ids may change > due to adding Tested-by's, etc. I noticed that patch 10 has my Reviewed-by, even though my comments weren't addressed. They were about stylistic issues but I'd still like to see them fixed now rather than having to fix them up later. Also I think I gave my Tested-by on those patches somewhere already and I think it's unlikely that anybody else will test them, so with the consistency style fixes applied I don't see any reason why that branch can't be stabilized right away. Thierry --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSAfBqAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhPKgQAKSZL7xAfnJiIg1jeRw0KxJZ sU+fV3AbwZB6xCdulXfgKDmPEfvazbtBCVrjvsjKr45NfYyQnBdQi2RIIIbmFMYc +MJ4mjbsYrJ5FgKfy/blxdx02dEp0h3HU4Tg5G5J2r87sQc124pkBoSaoH5rYiLA 1CapxUTr96en5/KZgVmYTl/1VNBZTkMqaXqZxbGTyBbdNEL2b7ALDx+GtrVKkmG0 ZUMWwg5PpHyeAxK1VJt7dpAgq0o+WECIIjL+kxW2BQ5C13ctQBdQvgqusrxa+uue upjJxGdtbtftdTHI0JNzCLRxiWM38oX8AOYRtJWiJ3ToE1cFw17anBrMNmPKlzSC hXLMYQx0gYfJtYu8j6UrMfS4dmhMRM7BCtQW0a8mp3QOgzBSSNeeCLc3nJzEqZQX hBHhcggkHTb853khVJgjBgT/wpfnTfDU5vtyoj1FzdEEp6nOILP+B05La6ByRQKJ 2V2BRyUSGlowZdz+hxcl6iN1BWXri7E8HsKXE/C2TS1o7ghKNKd69kYqM2Czd4tg Qb2D03tb0l3l9KlXhC3OScHdwbuw5mycod91aoxkNpULvmGmpOLdnUd4gmhqHDsB xCh/xd4cFuqOJ3R2yK+KA61gqKm0puSeFzhNln5+dKNLtNRdqhF7y+i4RNQV6SML KBBv9vF8kAw8+fD30tK0 =Pz4o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 08:59:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv6 00/13] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver In-Reply-To: <20130806200256.GB19280@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1375363516-2620-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130806200256.GB19280@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20130807065954.GA22906@manwe> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:02:56PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > Thomas, > > In order to get some testing in -next, I've *tentatively* applied this > series in the following way: > > +---+ mvebu/msi_common (1,2,3,10) > | > +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (4-9) > | > +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (11-13) > > I had to make one change to patch #9, I protected the last two blocks > with #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI to prevent a build failure at that point. > > mvebu/msi_common should be appropriate for Thierry to base off, however, > I make no guarantees about the stability of the branch until I send a > PR for it. Code-wise, it should be fine, but the commit-ids may change > due to adding Tested-by's, etc. I noticed that patch 10 has my Reviewed-by, even though my comments weren't addressed. They were about stylistic issues but I'd still like to see them fixed now rather than having to fix them up later. Also I think I gave my Tested-by on those patches somewhere already and I think it's unlikely that anybody else will test them, so with the consistency style fixes applied I don't see any reason why that branch can't be stabilized right away. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: