From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: libnfnetlink license Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 20:57:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20130807185743.GA4311@localhost> References: <5202698A.6070109@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Woerner Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:33329 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757311Ab3HGS5x (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:57:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5202698A.6070109@redhat.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote: > Hello, > > according to the libnfnetlink README the license is GPLv2+, but the > information in src/iftable.c and src/rtnl.c is "GNU GPLv2" without > the "+". Is this intentional? > > src/iftable.c: * This software is Free Software and licensed under > GNU GPLv2. > src/rtnl.c: * This software is free software and licensed under GNU GPLv2. > README:This library is released under GPLv2+. Those are leftovers, fixed here. http://git.netfilter.org/libnfnetlink/commit/?id=617fe823da5bef47dac77c19bf811ce211f148e9