From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 04:34:04 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 3.10-stable] at91sam9x5 rtc causes damage In-Reply-To: <52029EF7.3040105@interlog.com> References: <52027AB3.1040806@interlog.com> <20130807190801.GB2525@kroah.com> <52029EF7.3040105@interlog.com> Message-ID: <20130807193404.GA3248@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 03:24:39PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > On 13-08-07 03:08 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:49:55PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > >>This one probably needs more sign-offs but some folks seem to be > >>away. It is pretty simple and fixed in the current lk 3.11.0-rc > >>series. So it just impacts the lk 3.10 series including lk 3.10.5 . > >> > >>ChangeLog: > >> - without this patch members of the at91sam9x5 family (e.g. > >> at91sam9g25) that use the RTC will receive an unhandled > >> interrupt whenever they try to write to the RTC. In the > >> case of 9x5 SoCs that is the SYS interrupt shared with > >> several other things such as the debug port. Thereafter > >> the debug port becomes useless (for input), the RTC doesn't > >> work ... > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert > > > > > > > >This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > >stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > >for how to do this properly. > > > > > > Fine. I'll leave it. Leave what? Did you read the above file that shows how to get a patch into the stable tree? Follow that and all should be fine. thanks, greg k-h