From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Spurious Acks (was Re: PVH domU patches....) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 08:57:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20130808125756.GA3885@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com> References: <20130801102133.GA78039@ocelot.phlegethon.org> <20130805141811.4963b239@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20130806130058.GB24825@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20130806134319.GE1631@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20130808004652.GA2804@phenom.dumpdata.com> <520363B602000078000EA1FD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <520363B602000078000EA1FD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Wei Liu , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Tim Deegan , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:24:06AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 08.08.13 at 02:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Maybe we should copy the SubmittingPatches from Linux in the file so we > > have it in there and just base it on that? > > Our flow is a bit different from theirs, so doing so without some > editing might cause more confusion than clarification. Sounds a like a perfect candidate then - otherwise we are bound to hit issues when folks are used to Linux try to develop in Xen and hit the process problem. I will post a patch with the initial copy of SubmittingPatches and then some on follow patches with some modifications of what I think had been discussed in the past. > > Jan >