From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 12/23] PVH xen: Support privileged op emulation for PVH Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:10:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20130809181050.GA18790@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1374631171-15224-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <1374631171-15224-13-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <20130807185941.56d3613d@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20130808183249.17340c18@mantra.us.oracle.com> <5204AE3702000078000EA8E0@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5204AE3702000078000EA8E0@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: George Dunlap , "keir.xen@gmail.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > That sounds like a good change to me. Jan, you OK with this? > > It's worse performance wise, but better maintenance wise, so I > guess I don't really object (but also am not too happy with it). Jan this is confusing. We are looking for you and Keir as guidance as both of you are the maintainers and have the final say in the x86 architecture. Which way would you like it?