From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348D4E0048B for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 10:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r7AHUfYU012354; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:30:41 -0500 Received: from DFLE73.ent.ti.com (dfle73.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.110]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7AHUfAN022736; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:30:41 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DFLE73.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:30:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (gtudedge.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7AHUfTO025006; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:30:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 13:30:40 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Brian Hutchinson Message-ID: <20130810173039.GA27433@edge> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti mailing list Subject: Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6? X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:30:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:21:12AM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > > > > . > > > > anyway, as i said, masking out recipes-graphics was a stopgap > > measure, but i'd rather do this the "right" way, if someone wants to > > explain what the "right" way is. > > > > rday > > > > I don't know. I first renamed mesa_9.1.5.bbappend to messa_9.1.6.bbappend > and that worked to continue my build but like I said I ran into other > issues ... if you look back a few days you can see where I posted about > that. What worked for me was a clean checkout of the branches. YMMV I > guess :) So, both of you went back and forth for couple days, generating dozens of emails, but nobody offered a trivial rename patch to fix it... :) Anyway, it's fixed now - I just wasn't paying attention to the master for the past few days and didn't have time to take care of it right away. The problem with mesa is that it now gets bumped to every minor version on almost a weekly basis and sometimes I just miss the fact that it broke meta-ti/master due to the bbappend we have. I need to try to push that change we carry to oe-core so we wouldn't need a bbappend... -- Denys