From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
aswin@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, "Bui,
Tuan" <tuan.d.bui@hp.com>, Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
"Makphaibulchoke, Thavatchai" <thavatchai.makpahibulchoke@hp.com>,
"Bueso, Davidlohr" <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Give idle_balance() a break when it does not move tasks.
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:30:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130812110045.GA1925@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376296970.1795.9.camel@j-VirtualBox>
> /*
> @@ -5298,6 +5300,8 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
> continue;
>
> if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) {
> + load_balance_attempted = true;
> +
> /* If we've pulled tasks over stop searching: */
> pulled_task = load_balance(this_cpu, this_rq,
> sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, &balance);
> @@ -5322,6 +5326,10 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
> */
> this_rq->next_balance = next_balance;
> }
> +
> + /* Give idle balance on this CPU a break when it isn't moving tasks */
> + if (load_balance_attempted && !pulled_task)
> + this_rq->next_newidle_balance = jiffies + (HZ / 100);
> }
Looks reasonable. However should we do this per sd and not per rq. i.e
move the next_newidle_balance to sched_domain. So if we find a
load_balance in newly_idle context that wasn't successful, we skip
load_balance for that sd in the next newly idle balance.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 8:42 [PATCH] sched: Give idle_balance() a break when it does not move tasks Jason Low
2013-08-12 11:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-08-12 20:19 ` Jason Low
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130812110045.GA1925@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thavatchai.makpahibulchoke@hp.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tuan.d.bui@hp.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.