From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched, x86: Provide a per-cpu preempt_count implementation
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:15:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130814133142.881926488@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20130814131539.790947874@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-x86-per-cpu-preempt_count.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6784 bytes --]
Convert x86 to use a per-cpu preemption count. The reason for doing so
is that accessing per-cpu variables is a lot cheaper than accessing
thread_info variables.
With this preempt_enable() reduces to:
decl fs:__preempt_count
jnz 1f
call preempt_schedule
1:
We still need to save/restore the actual preemption count due to
PREEMPT_ACTIVE so we place the per-cpu __preempt_count variable in the
same cache-line as the other hot __switch_to() variables such as
current_task.
Also rename thread_info::preempt_count to ensure nobody is
'accidentally' still poking at it.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-dechwc0p86ik69ajunev8brp@git.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild | 1
arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 5 +---
arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 5 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 7 +-----
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 4 ---
arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 10 +++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 10 +++++++++
9 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -5,4 +5,3 @@ genhdr-y += unistd_64.h
genhdr-y += unistd_x32.h
generic-y += clkdev.h
-generic-y += preempt.h
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_PREEMPT_H
+#define __ASM_PREEMPT_H
+
+#include <asm/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/thread_info.h>
+
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count);
+
+/*
+ * We mask the PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED bit so as not to confuse all current users
+ * that think a non-zero value indicates we cannot preempt.
+ */
+static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
+{
+ return __raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
+}
+
+static __always_inline int *preempt_count_ptr(void)
+{
+ return &__raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count);
+}
+
+/*
+ * must be macros to avoid header recursion hell
+ */
+#define task_preempt_count(p) \
+ (task_thread_info(p)->saved_preempt_count & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED)
+
+#define init_task_preempt_count(p) do { \
+ task_thread_info(p)->saved_preempt_count = 1 | PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED; \
+} while (0)
+
+#define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu) do { \
+ task_thread_info(p)->saved_preempt_count = 0; \
+ per_cpu(__preempt_count, (cpu)) = 0; \
+} while (0)
+
+#endif /* __ASM_PREEMPT_H */
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -28,8 +28,7 @@ struct thread_info {
__u32 flags; /* low level flags */
__u32 status; /* thread synchronous flags */
__u32 cpu; /* current CPU */
- int preempt_count; /* 0 => preemptable,
- <0 => BUG */
+ int saved_preempt_count;
mm_segment_t addr_limit;
struct restart_block restart_block;
void __user *sysenter_return;
@@ -49,7 +48,7 @@ struct thread_info {
.exec_domain = &default_exec_domain, \
.flags = 0, \
.cpu = 0, \
- .preempt_count = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT, \
+ .saved_preempt_count = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT, \
.addr_limit = KERNEL_DS, \
.restart_block = { \
.fn = do_no_restart_syscall, \
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ void common(void) {
OFFSET(TI_flags, thread_info, flags);
OFFSET(TI_status, thread_info, status);
OFFSET(TI_addr_limit, thread_info, addr_limit);
- OFFSET(TI_preempt_count, thread_info, preempt_count);
BLANK();
OFFSET(crypto_tfm_ctx_offset, crypto_tfm, __crt_ctx);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1095,6 +1095,9 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(char *, irq_stack_ptr) =
DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count) = -1;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
+
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, fpu_owner_task);
/*
@@ -1169,6 +1172,8 @@ void debug_stack_reset(void)
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, current_task) = &init_task;
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(current_task);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, fpu_owner_task);
#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
@@ -362,12 +362,9 @@ END(ret_from_exception)
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
ENTRY(resume_kernel)
DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_ANY)
- cmpl $0,TI_preempt_count(%ebp) # non-zero preempt_count ?
- jnz restore_all
need_resched:
- movl TI_flags(%ebp), %ecx # need_resched set ?
- testb $_TIF_NEED_RESCHED, %cl
- jz restore_all
+ cmpl $0,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
+ jnz restore_all
testl $X86_EFLAGS_IF,PT_EFLAGS(%esp) # interrupts off (exception path) ?
jz restore_all
call preempt_schedule_irq
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1118,10 +1118,8 @@ ENTRY(native_iret)
/* Returning to kernel space. Check if we need preemption */
/* rcx: threadinfo. interrupts off. */
ENTRY(retint_kernel)
- cmpl $0,TI_preempt_count(%rcx)
+ cmpl $0,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
jnz retint_restore_args
- bt $TIF_NEED_RESCHED,TI_flags(%rcx)
- jnc retint_restore_args
bt $9,EFLAGS-ARGOFFSET(%rsp) /* interrupts off? */
jnc retint_restore_args
call preempt_schedule_irq
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -291,6 +291,16 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p,
if (get_kernel_rpl() && unlikely(prev->iopl != next->iopl))
set_iopl_mask(next->iopl);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
+ /*
+ * If it were not for PREEMPT_ACTIVE we could guarantee that the
+ * preempt_count of all tasks was equal here and this would not be
+ * needed.
+ */
+ task_thread_info(prev_p)->saved_preempt_count = __raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count);
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count) = task_thread_info(next_p)->saved_preempt_count;
+#endif
+
/*
* Now maybe handle debug registers and/or IO bitmaps
*/
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -363,6 +363,16 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p,
this_cpu_write(old_rsp, next->usersp);
this_cpu_write(current_task, next_p);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
+ /*
+ * If it were not for PREEMPT_ACTIVE we could guarantee that the
+ * preempt_count of all tasks was equal here and this would not be
+ * needed.
+ */
+ task_thread_info(prev_p)->saved_preempt_count = __raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count);
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(__preempt_count) = task_thread_info(next_p)->saved_preempt_count;
+#endif
+
this_cpu_write(kernel_stack,
(unsigned long)task_stack_page(next_p) +
THREAD_SIZE - KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-14 13:15 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] preempt_count rework Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched: Introduce preempt_count accessor functions Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Add NEED_RESCHED to the preempt_count Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched, arch: Create asm/preempt.h Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 13:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Create more preempt_count accessors Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-08-14 13:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] preempt_count rework H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-14 15:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-08-14 15:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-15 9:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-08-14 16:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 16:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-14 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 16:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-14 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 16:48 ` Andi Kleen
2013-08-14 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-14 17:12 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130814133142.881926488@chello.nl \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.