From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA12FE0144E for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r7FJYT0c000697; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:34:29 -0500 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlee70.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7FJYT57014008; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:34:29 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:34:29 -0500 Received: from localhost (gtudedge.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7FJYS8Q003393; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:34:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:34:28 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Brian Hutchinson Message-ID: <20130815193427.GJ2190@edge> References: <20130815190600.GF2190@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" , Chris Larson Subject: Re: Stumped. Can't get 2.6.37 TI kernel to boot when built with toolchain from denzil or Linaro gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.8-2013.07-1_linux/ X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 19:34:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:26:55PM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > > Yes, it is often a PITA to get old kernels build ... > > > > What do you mean "old kernels" It is from a TI PSP released not that long > ago! Wink, wink. I'd love to use a 3+ kernel, know where I can find one ;) So, cross-referencing the 2.6.37 release date of January 4, 2011 against gcc releases shows that you can only expect 4.4 or 4.5 to work properly out of the box w/o patching... :) And I have already answered the "newer TI81x kernel" question many times, including the last email in this thread :) -- Denys