From: Bruce Guenter <bruce@untroubled.org>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfs client: Now you see it, now you don't (aka spurious ESTALE errors)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:16:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819211601.GA25826@untroubled.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130726145937.GB30651@fieldses.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1641 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:59:37AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:05:26PM +0000, Larry Keegan wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:11:43 -0400
> > Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:45:15 +0000
> > > Larry Keegan <lk@pfw.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The problem I am seeing is that for the past month or so, on and
> > > > off, one NFS client starts reporting stale NFS file handles on some
> > > > part of the directory tree exported by the NFS server. During the
> > > > outage the other parts of the same export remain unaffected.
>
> And the problem affects just that one directory? Ohter files and
> directories on the same filesystem continue to be accessible?
FWIW I have also experienced the same problem. Randomly, some part of a
NFS (v4) mounted directory tree start return ESTALE, while the rest of
the tree remains accessable.
I am currently running linux 3.9.7 on the server, and have experienced
the problem on clients running linux 3.8.11 and 3.10. The underlying
filesystem is ext4 on dm-crypt.
Unlike the OP, I have not seen the behavior go away after a period of
time, although perhaps I didn't wait long enough. The only fix I found
is to unmount and re-mount (which gets to be a nuisance when ones' home
directory is NFS mounted).
FWIW During the most recent failure, I straced ls and noticed that the
stat on the failing directory works, but opening it failed. I don't know
if that's significant, but I didn't see it mentioned before.
--
Bruce Guenter <bruce@untroubled.org> http://untroubled.org/
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-25 13:45 nfs client: Now you see it, now you don't Larry Keegan
2013-07-25 14:11 ` nfs client: Now you see it, now you don't (aka spurious ESTALE errors) Jeff Layton
2013-07-25 14:24 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-07-25 14:33 ` Jeff Layton
2013-07-25 14:41 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-07-25 17:05 ` Larry Keegan
2013-07-25 18:18 ` Jeff Layton
2013-07-26 12:41 ` Larry Keegan
2013-07-26 13:12 ` Jeff Layton
2013-07-26 15:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-07-26 22:25 ` Larry Keegan
2013-07-31 14:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-07-31 19:50 ` Larry Keegan
2013-07-31 20:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-07-26 16:10 ` Larry Keegan
2013-07-26 14:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-07-26 23:21 ` Larry Keegan
2013-08-06 11:02 ` Larry Keegan
2013-08-06 11:14 ` Jeff Layton
2013-08-06 13:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-06 15:38 ` Larry Keegan
2013-08-19 21:16 ` Bruce Guenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819211601.GA25826@untroubled.org \
--to=bruce@untroubled.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.