All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] rcu: Simplify _rcu_barrier() processing
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:50:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130820185006.GM29406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52133B51.3020007@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:48:01PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 10:42 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > This commit drops an unneeded ACCESS_ONCE() and simplifies an "our work
> > is done" check in _rcu_barrier().  This applies feedback from Linus
> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/26/777) that he gave to similar code
> > in an unrelated patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcutree.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index c6a064a..612aff1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -2817,9 +2817,20 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  	 * transition.  The "if" expression below therefore rounds the old
> >  	 * value up to the next even number and adds two before comparing.
> >  	 */
> > -	snap_done = ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done);
> > +	snap_done = rsp->n_barrier_done;
> >  	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Check", -1, snap_done);
> > -	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(snap_done, ((snap + 1) & ~0x1) + 2)) {
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the value in snap is odd, we needed to wait for the current
> > +	 * rcu_barrier() to complete, then wait for the next one, in other
> > +	 * words, we need the value of snap_done to be three larger than
> > +	 * the value of snap.  On the other hand, if the value in snap is
> > +	 * even, we only had to wait for the next rcu_barrier() to complete,
> > +	 * in other words, we need the value of snap_done to be only two
> > +	 * greater than the value of snap.  The "(snap + 3) & 0x1" computes
> 
> "(snap + 3) & 0x1"
> ==> "(snap + 3) & ~0x1"

Good catch, fixed!

							Thanx, Paul

> > +	 * this for us (thank you, Linus!).
> > +	 */
> > +	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(snap_done, (snap + 3) & ~0x1)) {
> >  		_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "EarlyExit", -1, snap_done);
> >  		smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
> >  		mutex_unlock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-20 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-20  2:41 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] v2 Fixes for 3.12 Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Expedite grace periods during suspend/resume Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/9] rcu: Simplify debug-objects fixups Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/9] debugobjects: Make debug_object_activate() return status Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/9] rcu: Make call_rcu() leak callbacks for debug-object errors Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/9] rcu: Avoid redundant grace-period kthread wakeups Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] rculist: list_first_or_null_rcu() should use list_entry_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] rcu: Select IRQ_WORK from TREE_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] rcu: Simplify _rcu_barrier() processing Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  9:48     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-08-20 18:50       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-08-20  2:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 9/9] jiffies: Avoid undefined behavior from signed overflow Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  9:58   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Expedite grace periods during suspend/resume Lai Jiangshan
2013-08-20 18:42     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130820185006.GM29406@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.