Re: [PATCH 0/9] ALSA: compress offfload fixes

[Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 937 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:32:28PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> > > Since lot of embedded folks will be on 3.10 then would have been nicer if it
> > > went to stable.
> 
> > "It'd be nice" doesn't satisfy the condition for stable kernels,
> > unfortunately.
> 
> On the other hand if there's an issue which essentially every user is
> most likely going to end up backporting a fix for it seems reasonable to
> consider getting that resolved.  Personally I'd be a lot more
> conservative than Vinod with this one and only consider the fix for
> blocking during drain.  The current series seems rather invasive though.
Not all are marked for stable. Only thecouple to fix locking problem and
defination of sampling_rate. Rest will go thru usual cycle, though I suspect
with folks in embedded will take complete series.

~Vinod
-- 

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]