All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / hotplug: Remove containers synchronously
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:53:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828185350.GB3471@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1883675.1ifF1KoWz3@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:51:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The current protocol for handling hot remove of containers is very
> fragile and causes acpi_eject_store() to acquire acpi_scan_lock
> which may deadlock with the removal of the device that it is called
> for (the reason is that device sysfs attributes cannot be removed
> while their callbacks are being executed and ACPI device objects
> are removed under acpi_scan_lock).
> 
> The problem is related to the fact that containers are handled by
> acpi_bus_device_eject() in a special way, which is to emit an
> offline uevent instead of just removing the container.  Then, user
> space is expected to handle that uevent and use the container's
> "eject" attribute to actually remove it.  That is fragile, because
> user space may fail to complete the ejection (for example, by not
> using the container's "eject" attribute at all) leaving the BIOS
> kind of in a limbo.  Moreover, if the eject event is not signaled
> for a container itself, but for its parent device object (or
> generally, for an ancestor above it in the ACPI namespace), the
> container will be removed straight away without doing that whole
> dance.
> 
> For this reason, modify acpi_bus_device_eject() to remove containers
> synchronously like any other objects (user space will get its uevent
> anyway in case it does some other things in response to it) and
> remove the eject_pending ACPI device flag that is not used any more.
> This way acpi_eject_store() doesn't have a reason to acquire
> acpi_scan_lock any more and one possible deadlock scenario goes
> away (plus the code is simplified a bit).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-28 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-25 20:09 [PATCH] driver core / ACPI: Avoid device removal locking problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-25 21:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-26  3:13 ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-26 12:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-26 14:43     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-26 15:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-27  3:26         ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27  9:21         ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27 18:36           ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-27 21:45             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 10:03               ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 12:24               ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-28 13:24                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 13:45                   ` [PATCH 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 13:48                     ` [PATCH 1/2] driver core / ACPI: Avoid device hot remove locking issues Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 18:53                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-29  2:02                       ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 13:51                     ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / hotplug: Remove containers synchronously Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-28 18:53                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-08-29  2:02                       ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 17:06                     ` [PATCH 0/2] driver core / ACPI: Avoid device removal locking problems Toshi Kani
2013-08-29  2:00                     ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27 21:38           ` [PATCH] " Toshi Kani
2013-08-28  2:12             ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-28 16:55               ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-27  2:03       ` Gu Zheng
2013-08-27  2:38       ` Gu Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130828185350.GB3471@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.