From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077BDE0144E for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (unknown [88.170.243.169]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E496D481AC; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:00:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:00:37 +0200 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Daiane Angolini Message-ID: <20130828200037.48571a17@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: <521E3159.7010908@freescale.com> References: <521E28B7.7040105@freescale.com> <521E3159.7010908@freescale.com> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: GPU tests on master next - core-image-x11 - sfp X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:00:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:20:25 -0300, Daiane Angolini a =E9crit : > On 08/28/2013 01:43 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote: > > I've been running some tests on master-next. > > > > I used the following commands. Do you know any other I could run? > > > > >=20 > The past email, was for SOFT fp > > RESULTS: > > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 glxgears > > 108 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 21.508 FPS > > > > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 es2gears_x11 > > 1494 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 298.740 FPS > > > > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 glmark2-es2 > > glmark2 Score: 212 > > > > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 glmark2-es2 --fullscreen > > glmark2 Score: 229 >=20 > The results for HARD fp: >=20 >=20 > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 glxgears > 107 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 21.395 FPS >=20 > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 es2gears_x11 > 1451 frames in 5.0 seconds =3D 290.200 FPS >=20 > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 glmark2-es2 > glmark2 Score: 213 >=20 > $ DISPLAY=3D:0 glmark2-es2 --fullscreen > glmark2 Score: 228 >=20 so hardfp brings lower results than softfp ... interesting ;-) Eric