From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pb0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VEfei-0005BP-Dr for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:19:29 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rq2so6219700pbb.19 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:24:05 -0400 From: Huang Shijie To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] mtd: fix the wrong mtd->type for nand chip Message-ID: <20130829012403.GA4254@gmail.com> References: <1377509808-29363-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1377509808-29363-7-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <521D69B6.7070504@gmail.com> <521D9FCC.5010104@freescale.com> <521DA6B3.9080003@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <521DA6B3.9080003@gmail.com> Cc: Huang Shijie , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:28:51AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > On 08/27/2013 11:59 PM, Huang Shijie wrote: > > Yes, I saw that. > > >That's why we should expose the MTD_MLCNANDFLASH to the user-space > > All you've shown is the breakage, not the reason for exposing > MTD_MLCNANFLASH. There's a difference between MTD_MLCNANDFLASH being Do you mean this patch exposes the MTD_MLCNANDFLASH to user space? or the patch 8 exposes the MTD_MLCNANDFLASH to user space? thanks Huang Shijie