From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37229 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625Ab3H2VaL (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:30:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:32:34 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 Message-ID: <20130829213234.GA24433@kroah.com> References: <521FBB99.3040205@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <521FBB99.3040205@kernel.org> Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: > > Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d > > for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: > > iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. > > Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that > can occur in the at91 adc driver. How "necessary" is this for 3.11? Is it something that a user can hit today? Is it a regression from 3.10? Is it for a new driver? It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? thanks, greg k-h