From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless update of refcount Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:17:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20130830171707.GV31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1375758759-29629-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1375758759-29629-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1377751465.4028.20.camel@pasglop> <20130829070012.GC27322@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Waiman Long , Alexander Viro , Jeff Layton , Miklos Szeredi , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Andi Kleen , "Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" , "Norton, Scott J" To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:43:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > We'll see. The real problem is that I'm not sure if I can even see the > scalability issue on any machine I actually personally want to use > (read: silent). On my current system I can only get up to 15% > _raw_spin_lock by just stat'ing the same file over and over and over > again from lots of threads. Yeah, silent basically limits you to i7 single socket systems and sadly Intel doesn't seem to want to make those with more than 4 cores on :/ I've got a i7-K part (SNB iirc) with a _huge_ scythe cooler and a high efficiency fanless PSU for a system that's near noiseless -- as in my Thinkpad actually makes more noise.