From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: KVM: Simple optimization based on Xiao's patch
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 17:16:37 +0300
Message-ID: <20130901141637.GL22899@redhat.com>
References: <20130830125011.ba85e94d.yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39784 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753273Ab3IAOQ4 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 1 Sep 2013 10:16:56 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130830125011.ba85e94d.yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:50:11PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> I think this patch set answers Gleb's comment.
> 
It does. Thanks.

--
			Gleb.