From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used()
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 08:50:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130902055048.GA19838@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377836962-49780-3-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:29:18PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We tend to batch the used adding and signaling in vhost_zerocopy_callback()
> which may result more than 100 used buffers to be updated in
> vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() in some cases. So wwitch to use
switch
> vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() to avoid multiple calls to
> vhost_add_used_and_signal(). Which means much more less times of used index
> updating and memory barriers.
pls put info on perf gain in commit log too
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 280ee66..8a6dd0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(struct vhost_net *net,
> {
> struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq =
> container_of(vq, struct vhost_net_virtqueue, vq);
> - int i;
> + int i, add;
> int j = 0;
>
> for (i = nvq->done_idx; i != nvq->upend_idx; i = (i + 1) % UIO_MAXIOV) {
> @@ -289,14 +289,17 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(struct vhost_net *net,
> vhost_net_tx_err(net);
> if (VHOST_DMA_IS_DONE(vq->heads[i].len)) {
> vq->heads[i].len = VHOST_DMA_CLEAR_LEN;
> - vhost_add_used_and_signal(vq->dev, vq,
> - vq->heads[i].id, 0);
> ++j;
> } else
> break;
> }
> - if (j)
> - nvq->done_idx = i;
> + while (j) {
> + add = min(UIO_MAXIOV - nvq->done_idx, j);
> + vhost_add_used_and_signal_n(vq->dev, vq,
> + &vq->heads[nvq->done_idx], add);
> + nvq->done_idx = (nvq->done_idx + add) % UIO_MAXIOV;
> + j -= add;
> + }
> }
>
> static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, bool success)
> --
> 1.7.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used()
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 08:50:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130902055048.GA19838@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377836962-49780-3-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:29:18PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We tend to batch the used adding and signaling in vhost_zerocopy_callback()
> which may result more than 100 used buffers to be updated in
> vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() in some cases. So wwitch to use
switch
> vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() to avoid multiple calls to
> vhost_add_used_and_signal(). Which means much more less times of used index
> updating and memory barriers.
pls put info on perf gain in commit log too
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 280ee66..8a6dd0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(struct vhost_net *net,
> {
> struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq =
> container_of(vq, struct vhost_net_virtqueue, vq);
> - int i;
> + int i, add;
> int j = 0;
>
> for (i = nvq->done_idx; i != nvq->upend_idx; i = (i + 1) % UIO_MAXIOV) {
> @@ -289,14 +289,17 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(struct vhost_net *net,
> vhost_net_tx_err(net);
> if (VHOST_DMA_IS_DONE(vq->heads[i].len)) {
> vq->heads[i].len = VHOST_DMA_CLEAR_LEN;
> - vhost_add_used_and_signal(vq->dev, vq,
> - vq->heads[i].id, 0);
> ++j;
> } else
> break;
> }
> - if (j)
> - nvq->done_idx = i;
> + while (j) {
> + add = min(UIO_MAXIOV - nvq->done_idx, j);
> + vhost_add_used_and_signal_n(vq->dev, vq,
> + &vq->heads[nvq->done_idx], add);
> + nvq->done_idx = (nvq->done_idx + add) % UIO_MAXIOV;
> + j -= add;
> + }
> }
>
> static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, bool success)
> --
> 1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-30 4:29 [PATCH V2 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] vhost_net: make vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() returns void Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 5:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02 5:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02 6:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 6:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 5:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-09-02 5:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02 6:28 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 6:28 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n() Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30 18:35 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-30 18:35 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-09-02 3:15 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 3:15 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] vhost_net: poll vhost queue after marking DMA is done Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30 16:44 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-08-30 16:44 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-09-02 3:06 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 3:06 ` Jason Wang
2014-02-12 7:38 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jason Wang
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jason Wang
2014-02-12 16:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-12 16:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-02-12 7:38 ` Qin Chuanyu
2013-08-30 4:29 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] vhost_net: correctly limit the max pending buffers Jason Wang
2013-08-30 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 5:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02 5:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02 6:30 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 6:30 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-02 8:37 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130902055048.GA19838@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.