diff for duplicates of <201309051251.39877.marex@denx.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index ffa5597..04d7c18 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ Dear Dan Carpenter, -> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, J=FCrgen Beisert wrote: +> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, J?rgen Beisert wrote: > > I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series > > of SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this "new style" will be > > accepted? ->=20 +> > My lradc_plate_mask() is basically the same idea as what Marek said > about putting the logic into the define. ->=20 -> LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) =3D=3D MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff) ->=20 +> +> LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) == MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff) +> > I don't know why Marek is complaining about churn though. This is > linux! We love churn! And especially in staging, it's our favorite > thing. :P diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d877ecb..79344e2 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,30 +1,24 @@ "ref\01378299706-6742-1-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de\0" "ref\0201309051216.18305.jbe@pengutronix.de\0" "ref\020130905104256.GK6329@mwanda\0" - "From\0Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver\0" + "From\0marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver\0" "Date\0Thu, 5 Sep 2013 12:51:39 +0200\0" - "To\0Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>\0" - "Cc\0J\303\274rgen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>" - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - devel@driverdev.osuosl.org - Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> - linux-iio@vger.kernel.org - " Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Dear Dan Carpenter,\n" "\n" - "> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, J=FCrgen Beisert wrote:\n" + "> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, J?rgen Beisert wrote:\n" "> > I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series\n" "> > of SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this \"new style\" will be\n" "> > accepted?\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> My lradc_plate_mask() is basically the same idea as what Marek said\n" "> about putting the logic into the define.\n" - ">=20\n" - "> LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) =3D=3D MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff)\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" + "> LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) == MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff)\n" + "> \n" "> I don't know why Marek is complaining about churn though. This is\n" "> linux! We love churn! And especially in staging, it's our favorite\n" "> thing. :P\n" @@ -34,4 +28,4 @@ "Best regards,\n" Marek Vasut -99d08e39d8d6032c445d83bc2c9cbf383d0dec4d46c314ef79b34a9c0c5aa4d5 +bc1b5b5a10556c23eac314a78f103ff2e187c31f031bd2c2af5d9909622475fe
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.