All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build?
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 11:15:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130907111552.0d646140@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EEBE54E3-BD6F-4BB5-88C4-CB3B51CC1FCC@gmail.com>

Dear Khem Raj,

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:59:34 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:

> > In the mean time, I've experimented a bit and actually implemented it.
> > The patch hasn't been merged yet in Buildroot, but it has been posted:
> > http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-September/077344.html.
> > 
> > Don't hesitate to have a look and tell me what you think.
> 
> OK. The patch looks ok to me. one thing
> 
> Do you need to support multiple toolchains ? and how far do you want to go back ? I would much rather not
> have THREE_STAGE_BUILD options at all.

We do need to support building gcc 4.2.x, because that's the only
version for which thee AVR32 architecture is supported. I'm hoping that
in a year or two we can drop AVR32 support (the architecture has been
deprecated by Atmel), and therefore simplify a few things, but for now,
I believe we need to be able to support older gcc versions than 4.7/4.8.

Thanks for having a look at the patch!

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-07  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-05 21:38 [Buildroot] Two or three stages gcc build? Thomas Petazzoni
     [not found] ` <9C6FE6D2-322A-41E7-8B82-C623B5C1F754@gmail.com>
2013-09-06 12:58   ` Thomas Petazzoni
     [not found]     ` <EEBE54E3-BD6F-4BB5-88C4-CB3B51CC1FCC@gmail.com>
2013-09-07  9:15       ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
     [not found]         ` <CAL4-wQrTouutDaj2zCVmCQH4+XpEJMR05_goC2KrcF2HgXotiA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-07 11:49           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-19  5:02       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-08 18:58         ` Thomas Petazzoni
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-19 17:02 soochon radee
2013-09-19 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130907111552.0d646140@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.