Re: Coverity + XenProject + Process?

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:13:41PM -0700, Matt Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:00 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Hey
> > > 
> > > We have a static analyzer setup for Xen called Coverity. It allows
> > > the code to be inspected for bugs and such.
> > > 
> > > Originally I setup this so that we could make sure that there are no
> > > bugs that cause security issues - and as such invited only folks
> > > on the security Xen mailing list.
> > > 
> > > But there are other folks who I am sure would like to contribute
> > > and as Coverity is pretty amazing at analyzing issues and providing
> > > a good idea of how to fix it - was wondering what should be the
> > > procedure for involving volunteers for that?
> > 
> > This conversation and the decision is on going to take a while.
> > 
> > In the meantime we (security@ or xen-devel@) have received offers of
> > help from Matthew Daley, Andrew Cooper and Steven Maresca. All three are
> > well known to us and IMHO trustworthy. Matthew and Andrew have been
> > involved in both disclosing and helping to resolve multiple security
> > issues in the past. I don't think Steven has been involved in security
> > disclosure stuff (apologies Steven if I've forgotten) but has none the
> > less been active in Xen and with various security related aspects of the
> > project.
> > 
> > Given that I would like to propose that we give all three of them access
> > while the policy conversation is on going.
> > 
> > Any objections? If so then please raise them by the end of business this
> > Sunday (8 September).
> 
> +1

No objections either. +1 for all three!
> 
> --msw