From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-f171.google.com ([209.85.215.171]:62288 "EHLO mail-ea0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753405Ab3IJPam (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:30:42 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n15so3982346ead.16 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:30:37 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Olof Johansson Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , jic23@cam.ac.uk, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, LinusW , denis.ciocca@st.com, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] ARM: ux500: Remove PrimeCell IDs from Nomadik I2C DT nodes Message-ID: <20130910153037.GA11227@lee--X1> References: <1378817379-8238-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1378817379-8238-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > Turns out that they're actually not required and the driver probes just > > fine without them. The ID is incorrect at the moment anyway. They actually > > currently specify the stn8815. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > How did you test this patch? What hardware did you boot it on and with > what config? Snowball, u8500_defconfig. Why? Don't you have the same result with yours? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:30:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/38] ARM: ux500: Remove PrimeCell IDs from Nomadik I2C DT nodes In-Reply-To: References: <1378817379-8238-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1378817379-8238-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20130910153037.GA11227@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > Turns out that they're actually not required and the driver probes just > > fine without them. The ID is incorrect at the moment anyway. They actually > > currently specify the stn8815. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > How did you test this patch? What hardware did you boot it on and with > what config? Snowball, u8500_defconfig. Why? Don't you have the same result with yours? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog