From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756192Ab3ILSB2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:01:28 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:38679 "EHLO mail-bk0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756172Ab3ILSBY (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:01:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 20:01:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Sasha Levin Cc: Peter Zijlstra , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/9] liblockdep: userspace lockdep Message-ID: <20130912180120.GB32511@gmail.com> References: <1371163284-6346-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <20130626122408.GJ28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130626155325.GB7399@gmail.com> <51CB4328.7010006@oracle.com> <20130627090722.GC4398@gmail.com> <51CC4461.50207@oracle.com> <51DA127E.3040706@oracle.com> <20130708083914.GB3948@gmail.com> <5231FCA1.4090803@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5231FCA1.4090803@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/08/2013 04:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >* Sasha Levin wrote: > > > >>>>The other issue is that with lock classes disabled you have to hit an > >>>>actual deadlock to trigger any output. > >>>> > >>>>I.e. much of the power of lockdep is diminished :-/ When actual > >>>>deadlocks are triggered then it's not particularly complex to debug > >>>>user-space apps: gdb the hung task(s) and look at the backtraces. > >>> > >>>Lock classes are disabled only if you're using the LD_PRELOAD method > >>>of testing. If you actually re-compile your code with the library (by > >>>just including the header and setting a #define to enable it) you will > >>>have lock classes. > >> > >>Hi Ingo, > >> > >>Just wondering if you're planning on pushing it over to Linus from your > >>tree, or should I go ahead and do it on my own? > > > >PeterZ is in favor as well so I'll apply them after the merge window, for > >v3.12. > > Hi Ingo, > > Do you intend to send liblockdep in this merge window as planned? If Peter agrees with them and picks them up then the next merge window would be fine I guess. Thanks, Ingo