Re: [PATCH 5/6] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection

[Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>]

Dear Jürgen Beisert,

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On Sunday 15 September 2013 12:56:25 Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On 09/11/13 09:18, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > > For battery driven systems it is a very bad idea to collect the
> > > touchscreen data within a kernel busy loop.
> > > 
> > > This change uses the features of the hardware to delay and accumulate
> > > samples in hardware to avoid a high interrupt and CPU load.
> > > 
> > > Note: this is only tested on an i.MX23 SoC yet.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > > CC: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> > > CC: devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
> > > CC: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
> > > CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
> > > CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-KWPb1pKIrIJaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > While this driver is placed in IIO within staging at the moment, these
> > changes are definitely input related.  Hence I have cc'd Dmitry and the
> > input list.
> > 
> > I am personaly a little uncomfortable that we have such a complex bit of
> > input code sat within an IIO driver but such is life.
> 
> Maybe an MFD for this ADC unit would be a better way to go? Currently I
> have a different problem with this driver, because the ADC unit monitors
> the battery as well. And the charging driver from the power subsystem
> needs these values to charge the battery in a correct manner.

Are you planning to post the power block patches too ?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut