All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (Ludovic Desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:33:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130918073357.GO26819@ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309172228400.4089@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:15:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Marc Kleine-Budde pointed out, that commit 77cc982 "clocksource: use
> clockevents_config_and_register() where possible" caused a regression
> for some of the converted subarchs.
> 
> The reason is, that the clockevents core code converts the minimal
> hardware tick delta to a nanosecond value for core internal
> usage. This conversion is affected by integer math rounding loss, so
> the backwards conversion to hardware ticks will likely result in a
> value which is less than the configured hardware limitation. The
> affected subarchs used their own workaround (SIGH!) which got lost in
> the conversion.
> 
> Now instead of fixing the underlying core code problem, Marcs patch
> tried to work around the core code issue by increasing the minimal
> tick delta at clockevents registration time so the resulting limit in
> the core code backwards conversion did not violate the hardware
> limits. More SIGH!
> 
> The solution for the issue at hand is simple: adding evt->mult - 1 to
> the shifted value before the integer divison in the core conversion
> function takes care of it.
> 
> Though looking closer at the details of that function reveals another
> bogosity: The upper bounds check is broken as well. Checking for a
> resulting "clc" value greater than KTIME_MAX after the conversion is
> pointless. The conversion does:
> 
>       u64 clc = (latch << evt->shift) / evt->mult;
> 
> So there is no sanity check for (latch << evt->shift) exceeding the
> 64bit boundary. The latch argument is "unsigned long", so on a 64bit
> arch the handed in argument could easily lead to an unnoticed shift
> overflow. With the above rounding fix applied the calculation before
> the divison is:
> 
>        u64 clc = (latch << evt->shift) + evt->mult - 1;
> 
> Now we can easily verify whether the whole equation fits into the
> 64bit boundary. Shifting the "clc" result back by evt->shift MUST
> result in "latch". If that's not the case, we have a clear indicator
> for boundary violation and can limit "clc" to (1 << 63) - 1 before the
> divison by evt->mult. The resulting nsec * evt->mult in the
> programming path will therefor always be in the 64bit boundary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Tested-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>

Thanks

> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c
> index 38959c8..4fc4826 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c
> @@ -49,13 +49,25 @@ u64 clockevent_delta2ns(unsigned long latch, struct clock_event_device *evt)
>  		WARN_ON(1);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Prevent integer rounding loss, otherwise the backward
> +	 * conversion from nsec to ticks could result in a value less
> +	 * than evt->min_delta_ticks.
> +	 */
> +	clc += evt->mult - 1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Upper bound sanity check. If the backwards conversion is
> +	 * not equal latch, we know that the above (shift + rounding
> +	 * correction) exceeded the 64 bit boundary.
> +	 */
> +	if ((clc >> evt->shift) != (u64)latch)
> +		clc = ((u64)1 << 63) - 1;
> +
>  	do_div(clc, evt->mult);
> -	if (clc < 1000)
> -		clc = 1000;
> -	if (clc > KTIME_MAX)
> -		clc = KTIME_MAX;
>  
> -	return clc;
> +	/* Deltas less than 1usec are pointless noise */
> +	return clc > 1000 ? clc : 1000;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clockevent_delta2ns);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-18  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-13 13:02 [PATCH] [PATCH] clocksource: tcb: fix min_delta calculation Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-13 13:02 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-17  9:56 ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-09-17 10:04   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-17 10:04     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-17 11:26     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-17 11:26       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-17 13:01       ` Ludovic Desroches
2013-09-17 21:15         ` [PATCH] clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-17 21:15           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-17 22:25           ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-17 22:25             ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-17 23:20             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-17 23:20               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-18  7:33           ` Ludovic Desroches [this message]
2013-09-18  8:56           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-18  8:56             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-18  9:38             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-18  9:38               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-18 15:09               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-18 15:09                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-18 22:01                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-18 22:01                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 10:02                   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-19 10:02                     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-19 10:15                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 10:15                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 12:48                       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-19 12:48                         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-19 13:12                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 13:12                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 14:30                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 14:30                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 20:03                           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-19 20:03                             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-20  9:56                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-20  9:56                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-20 20:41                               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-20 20:41                                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-20 21:30                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-20 21:30                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-24 19:50                           ` [PATCH v2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-24 19:50                             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-24 21:11                             ` Timekeeping on at91rm9200 [Was: [PATCH v2] clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion] Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-24 21:11                               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-04 10:00                               ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-10-04 10:00                                 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-09-24 21:16                             ` [PATCH v2] clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion Uwe Kleine-König
2013-09-24 21:16                               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-08 10:08                             ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-10-08 10:08                               ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-10-08 15:31                               ` [GIT PULL] fixes for integer rounding in timer core (Was: [PATCH v2] clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion) Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-08 15:31                                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-14  7:34                                 ` [GIT PULL] fixes for integer rounding in timer core Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-14  7:34                                   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-16 14:19                                   ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-10-16 14:19                                     ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-10-21  7:12                                   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-21  7:12                                     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-10-21 20:53                                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-10-21 20:53                                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-10-23 10:56                             ` [tip:timers/urgent] clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130918073357.GO26819@ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.