From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Full syscall argument decode in "perf trace"
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:35:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130918133525.GB8141@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5239A0BE.7050203@gmail.com>
* David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/18/13 5:35 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >Therefore my question should be restated as:
> >
> >Would perf developers accept the "syscall pausing" feature,
> >or it won't be accepted?
>
> I have been using perf-trace a lot lately specifically because it is
> effectively a 'passive' observer of the task (e.g., time-sensitive tasks
> can be traced with perf but not with strace).
Yes, this is not just an important but a primary design goal for all perf
utilities: if the tracing buffers used are large enough then it should be
a nearly zero-overhead observer that preserves all previous patterns of
behavior as much as possible.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 19:06 [RFC] Full syscall argument decode in "perf trace" Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-18 11:35 ` Denys Vlasenko
2013-09-18 12:46 ` David Ahern
2013-09-18 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-09-18 14:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-26 7:41 ` Denys Vlasenko
2013-09-30 11:33 ` Denys Vlasenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-17 15:10 Denys Vlasenko
2013-09-17 17:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130918133525.GB8141@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.