From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:56:12 +0200 Message-ID: <201309181756.12782@pali> References: <1378630239-10006-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20130918133025.GB2953@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Pavel Machek , Felipe Balbi , Tony Lindgren , Anton Vorontsov , Russell King , David Woodhouse , Greg Kroah-Hartman , freemangordon@abv.bg, Aaro Koskinen , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:57:13 Javier Martinez Canillas=20 wrote: > to split the patch in two since the patch was solving > two separate issues My patch does not solving *two* issues. It is *one* regression=20 and both parts of patch are needed for fixing it. Read commit=20 message again. It does not make sense to split patch fixing kernel=20 regression into more one line patches - or please clarify why. =2D-=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com --nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlI5zRwACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1J/2QCgtFQe8mTu4aIHC5OhRIbOy+ai j+kAoLhlbffqZMhNXyb2DrhOLlJaNZof =G+Io -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?=) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:56:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed In-Reply-To: References: <1378630239-10006-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20130918133025.GB2953@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Message-ID: <201309181756.12782@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:57:13 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > to split the patch in two since the patch was solving > two separate issues My patch does not solving *two* issues. It is *one* regression and both parts of patch are needed for fixing it. Read commit message again. It does not make sense to split patch fixing kernel regression into more one line patches - or please clarify why. -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: