[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/5] qt5: bump to 5.1.1

[Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>]

Dear Fatih A??c?,

On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:18:23 +0300, Fatih A??c? wrote:
> Sorry. I forgot to add mail list to cc.
> 
> On Wednesday 18 September 2013 20:04:37 you wrote:
> > > -diff --git a/src/platformsupport/eglconvenience/eglconvenience.pri
> > > b/src/platformsupport/eglconvenience/eglconvenience.pri -index
> > > 188eb1c..8996cea 100644
> > > ---- a/src/platformsupport/eglconvenience/eglconvenience.pri
> > > -+++ b/src/platformsupport/eglconvenience/eglconvenience.pri
> > > -@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ contains(QT_CONFIG,egl) {
> > > -     SOURCES += \
> > > -         $$PWD/qeglconvenience.cpp \
> > > -         $$PWD/qeglplatformcontext.cpp
> > > -+    CONFIG += egl
> > > -
> > > -     contains(QT_CONFIG,xlib) {
> > > -         HEADERS += \
> > > ---
> > > -1.7.9.5
> > > -
> > 
> > Why is this patch removed? Was this fixed in Qt upstream? I see you're
> > adding a CONFIG += egl in another patch, but only for the X.org case.
> 
> It is fixed in upstream. The new patch is also sent to upstream and it is
> applied, too:
> 
> https://bugdiffs.qt-project.org/fisheye/changelog/Qt5-
> qtbase?cs=ff7b57bbb936bc86a64aa2a947fa8984adf400c8

Ok, thanks. This should have been part of the commit log :)

> > > diff --git a/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base-mkspecs-files.patch
> > > b/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base-mkspecs-files.patch index bfa9c15..e406cfc
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base-mkspecs-files.patch
> > > +++ b/package/qt5/qt5base/qt5base-mkspecs-files.patch
> > > @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ Index: b/mkspecs/devices/linux-buildroot-g++/qmake.conf
> > > 
> > >  ===================================================================
> > >  --- /dev/null
> > >  +++ b/mkspecs/devices/linux-buildroot-g++/qmake.conf
> > > 
> > > -@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > > +@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> > > 
> > >  +MAKEFILE_GENERATOR      = UNIX
> > > 
> > > -+CONFIG                  += incremental gdb_dwarf_index
> > > ++CONFIG                 += incremental gdb_dwarf_index
> > 
> > Is this change needed? Seems like white space change only, no?
> 
> I checked the mkspec files in old and new versions of upstream. Upstream's
> files have this change. So I changed our mkspec file to reduce diff output.
> I think, this will help checking again in new versions. Yes, it is only
> a white space change and not needed.

It's a bit early, so maybe my brain is not yet up and running, but if
the upstream has changed this, and we don't care about whether there's
a space or not, why does our patch contains something to change this?

> > > -		-nomake examples -nomake demos -nomake tests \
> > > +		-nomake examples -nomake tests \
> > 
> > No more demos to disable?
> 
> "examples" and "demos" directories are merged in this new version.
> configure script fails with "-nomake demos".

Ok. I was of course suspecting that, merely pointing out that a more
detailed commit log would have been nice.

>  
> > >  		-device buildroot \
> > >  		-no-c++11 \
> > >  		$(QT5BASE_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/package/qt5/qt5declarative/qt5declarative.mk
> > > b/package/qt5/qt5declarative/qt5declarative.mk index 603c0e7..943f33d
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/package/qt5/qt5declarative/qt5declarative.mk
> > > +++ b/package/qt5/qt5declarative/qt5declarative.mk
> > > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ ifeq ($(BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB),)
> > > 
> > >  define QT5DECLARATIVE_INSTALL_TARGET_LIBS
> > >  
> > >  	cp -dpf $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/libQt5Qml*.so.* $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib
> > >  	cp -dpf $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/libQt5Quick*.so.* 
> $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib
> > > 
> > > +	cp -dpfr $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/qt/plugins/accessible
> > > $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/qt/plugins
> > > 
> > >  	cp -dpfr $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/qt/plugins/qml*
> > >  	$(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/qt/plugins
> > >  
> > >  endef
> > >  endif
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/package/qt5/qt5jsbackend/qt5jsbackend-fix-uclibc.patch
> > > b/package/qt5/qt5jsbackend/qt5jsbackend-fix-uclibc.patch deleted file
> > > mode 100644
> > > index 50a6dbc..0000000
> > > --- a/package/qt5/qt5jsbackend/qt5jsbackend-fix-uclibc.patch
> > > +++ /dev/null
> > 
> > So this patch was merged upstream? Or is no longer needed?
> 
> It is upstreamed, too.

Ditto: to be mentioned in the commit log.

> > >  ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_LICENSE_APPROVED),y)
> > > 
> > > -QT5QUICK1_CONFIGURE_OPTS += -opensource -confirm-license
> > 
> > Hum why does this gets removed from qt5quick1 but not the other
> > packages? Maybe it's only needed in qt5base, but in this case, it
> > should be removed from all other packages, and as a separate patch,
> > since it's unrelated to the version bump, no?
> 
> OK. I will remove all of them with a separate patch.

Thanks a lot! Definitely nice to see Qt5 moving.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com