From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Did immutable bvecs accidentally break stable page writes?
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:32:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130919093250.GS22421@suse.de> (raw)
Commit ffecfd1a (block: optionally snapshot page contents to provide
stable pages during write) uses bounce buffers for stable page writes in
jbd and ext3. Simplistically, __blk_queue_bounce takes a force parameter
that is used when pages must be snapshot.
Commit 6bc454d1 (bounce: Refactor __blk_queue_bounce to not use
bi_io_vec) refactored __blk_queue_bounce and now the start of the
function looks like this
static void __blk_queue_bounce(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio_orig,
mempool_t *pool, int force)
{
struct bio *bio;
int rw = bio_data_dir(*bio_orig);
struct bio_vec *to, *from;
unsigned i;
bio_for_each_segment(from, *bio_orig, i)
if (page_to_pfn(from->bv_page) > queue_bounce_pfn(q))
goto bounce;
return;
bounce:
bio = bio_clone_bioset(*bio_orig, GFP_NOIO, fs_bio_set);
bio_for_each_segment_all(to, bio, i) {
struct page *page = to->bv_page;
if (page_to_pfn(page) <= queue_bounce_pfn(q) && !force)
continue;
Note that the first bio_for_each_segment is completely ignoring the
force parameter and hence snapshotting. This is particularly problematic
for ext3 which forces the use of MS_SNAP_STABLE.
I have not actually reproduced any problem, this is just code inspection
but it looks like commit 6bc454d1 broke ext3. Kent, why was the force
paramter ignored in that commit?
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-19 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 9:32 Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-09-19 9:40 ` Did immutable bvecs accidentally break stable page writes? Mel Gorman
2013-09-19 14:22 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-20 2:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130919093250.GS22421@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=koverstreet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.