From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: linux-next: old trees Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20130920183517.GH5707@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:44910 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753047Ab3ITSf2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130917170124.0afa2e103a9977355ad7c72c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:01:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below, > so apologies if you get two copies. > > I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in > linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been > commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me know if the tree is not > longer in use. I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they > will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer > needed. Thank you for the prunning effort. > ibft 1 year, 9 months ago Can go away. > swiotlb 11 months ago Need it. Don't remove it pls. > tmem 11 months ago Can go away.