From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
To: "Cooper Jr., Franklin" <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: "meta-arago@arago-project.org" <meta-arago@arago-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tisdk-rootfs-base-image: Rename base file system image
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:14:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130920211425.GF30673@edge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8F29D6B095ED194EA1980491A5E029710C558370@DFLE08.ent.ti.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 04:55:07PM -0400, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dmytriyenko, Denys
> > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 3:19 PM
> > To: Cooper Jr., Franklin
> > Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [PATCH 1/2] tisdk-rootfs-base-image: Rename base
> > file system image
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:38:06PM -0400, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dmytriyenko, Denys
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:31 PM
> > > > To: Cooper Jr., Franklin
> > > > Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [PATCH 1/2] tisdk-rootfs-base-image:
> > > > Rename base file system image
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:05:10PM -0400, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Dmytriyenko, Denys
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 2:52 PM
> > > > > > To: Cooper Jr., Franklin; meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [meta-arago] [PATCH 1/2] tisdk-rootfs-base-image:
> > > > > > Rename base file system image
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What was the initial reason to start naming rootfs images with
> > > > > > tisdk-rootfs- prefix? I remember it was something forced by the SDK
> > setup...
> > > > > [Franklin]
> > > > > This was before my time so I am not sure what the original reasoning was.
> > > > >
> > > > > I do assume there might be instances where some script somewhere
> > > > > will need to be updated if it refers to the full image as "tisdk-rootfs*"
> > > >
> > > > So, I located the change I was talking about:
> > > > http://arago-project.org/git/?p=meta-
> > > > arago.git;a=commitdiff;h=91f2be34e301deebbc75c54bbad6a5a27e25bf2c
> > > >
> > > > The "tisdk-image class had issues" is a rather vague description, so
> > > > I'm not sure or don't remember what was the problem that you had to
> > > > rename the original arago-tisdk-image into tisdk-rootfs-image...
> > > >
> >
> > > [Franklin] Ah I remember. The TARGET_IMAGES variable is used in two
> > > ways in that class. 1 to add a build dependency and 2 to reference the
> > > image tarball. So the assumption was that the recipe/package name was
> > > the same as the IMAGE_BASENAME. So the recipe and IMAGE_BASENAME
> > must
> > > match. Otherwise the image would be built but the class wouldn't know
> > > what tarball to look for.
> >
> > Ah, OK, this is not exactly what I was looking for. Tracing even further back
> > shows that you added the recipe to have IMAGE_BASENAME = "tisdk-rootfs":
> >
> > http://arago-project.org/git/?p=meta-
> > arago.git;a=commitdiff;h=f27b1f34aee2c2cbee25a0fb5b21cdb04f16ec4a
> >
> > Do you remember the reason for that? This image recipe was in Classic arago,
> > but there it had the basename matching the recipe name. Wondering why the
> > change?
> [Franklin] I think I was simply trying to match the filesystem tarball with
> the name used in previous sdks. I am assuming that the SDK backend script
> that built the sdk renamed those filesystem files. Looking at Sitara AMSDK
> 05.05.01 (last oe-classic based sdk) the two filesystem tarballs were named
> base-rootfs-am335x-evm.tar.gz and tisdk-rootfs-am335x-evm.tar.gz. During
> that time I was focused on just getting the filesystem working and wanted it
> to look like the output from previous sdks. I don't think I had any other
> reason.
Thanks! Just wanted to check if there was some sort of requirement for that
name change. If there is not, then we can look for a better names for full
image as well as base image.
Should we look into unifying the names for other image recipes? Is
tisdk-rootfs- the best base we can think of?
--
Denys
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: meta-arago-bounces@arago-project.org [mailto:meta-arago-
> > > > > > bounces@arago-project.org] On Behalf Of Cooper Jr., Franklin
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:13 PM
> > > > > > To: meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > > > > > Cc: Cooper Jr., Franklin
> > > > > > Subject: [meta-arago] [PATCH 1/2] tisdk-rootfs-base-image: Rename
> > base
> > > > file
> > > > > > system image
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * People are frequently confused by the difference in naming between
> > the
> > > > > > minimal
> > > > > > file system and the larger file system.
> > > > > > * Rename the minimal file system to mimic the naming convention of the
> > > > larger
> > > > > > file system.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S. Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > ...e-tisdk-image.bb => tisdk-rootfs-base-image.bb} | 2 +-
> > > > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) rename meta-arago-
> > > > > > distro/recipes-core/images/{arago-base-tisdk-image.bb => tisdk-rootfs-
> > > > base-
> > > > > > image.bb} (87%)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/arago-base-tisdk-
> > > > image.bb
> > > > > > b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-rootfs-base-image.bb
> > > > > > similarity index 87%
> > > > > > rename from meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/arago-base-tisdk-
> > > > > > image.bb
> > > > > > rename to meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-rootfs-base-
> > > > image.bb
> > > > > > index 2c0e217..a3a9123 100644
> > > > > > --- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/arago-base-tisdk-image.bb
> > > > > > +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-rootfs-base-
> > image.bb
> > > > > > @@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL += "\
> > > > > > packagegroup-arago-base-tisdk \
> > > > > > "
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -export IMAGE_BASENAME = "arago-base-tisdk-image"
> > > > > > +export IMAGE_BASENAME = "tisdk-rootfs-base-image"
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 1.7.0.4
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > meta-arago mailing list
> > > > > > meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > > > > > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-20 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 19:13 [PATCH 1/2] tisdk-rootfs-base-image: Rename base file system image Franklin S. Cooper Jr
2013-09-17 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] Use updated base image name Franklin S. Cooper Jr
2013-09-17 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] tisdk-rootfs-base-image: Rename base file system image Dmytriyenko, Denys
2013-09-17 20:05 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-20 19:30 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-09-20 19:38 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-20 20:18 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-09-20 20:55 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-20 21:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2013-09-23 14:53 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-23 15:34 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-09-24 19:52 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-09-24 20:09 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-26 19:28 ` Maupin, Chase
2013-09-26 19:52 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-09-26 19:57 ` Maupin, Chase
2013-09-26 23:20 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-26 16:55 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-26 17:24 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-09-17 22:30 ` Maupin, Chase
2013-09-17 22:34 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130920211425.GF30673@edge \
--to=denys@ti.com \
--cc=fcooper@ti.com \
--cc=meta-arago@arago-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.