From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Keepax Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: bells: Specify REFCLK for FLLs Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:08:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20130921200836.GI3635@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1379758218-28580-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20130921132833.GU21013@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098C7264F22 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 22:08:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130921132833.GU21013@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, sbkim73@samsung.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, ben-linux@fluff.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Ah... yeah sorry forgot that, have always had a crystal in my board. Best just ignore this patch I guess we will just have to not set a good example. Thanks, Charles On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 02:28:33PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > > Wolfson recommends using a higher frequency REFCLK for best performance > > rather than the default 32kHz reference clock source. We should set a > > good example and do so. > > The trick here is of course that MCLK1 is not guaranteed to be > physically present on the board and there are a range of possible > frequencies it could be set to... I'm not sure I actually have any > crystals.