Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
> Hi, Jonathan and Greg
> 
> On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
> >>>
> >>>    Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
> >>>
> >>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>
> >>>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
> >>>
> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
> >>>
> >>>    iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
> >>>
> >>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
> >>> can occur in the at91 adc driver.
> >> How "necessary" is this for 3.11?
> >> Is it something that a user can hit today?
> 
> The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a 
> big start-up time.
> And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think 
> it is rare case.
> 
> >> Is it a regression from 3.10?
> 
> No.
> 
> >> Is it for a new driver?
> 
> No.
> 
> > No
> >> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
> >> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches.  Can we just
> >> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
> > Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer
> > the above better than me.
> 
> So I am fine with this.

What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan,
did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me?

thanks,

greg k-h