From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
To: "Jeff Moyer" <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Auto stop async-write on block device when device removed.
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:07:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309241107330800706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x49r4cfy4py.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com
>majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> For async-write on block device,if device removed,but the vfs don't know it.
>> It will continue to do.
>> Patch1 set size of inode of block device to zero when removed disk.By this,vfs know
>> disk changed.
>> Path2 add size-check on blk_aio_write.If pos of write larger than size of inode,it will
>> return zero.So the user can check disk state.
>
>OK, so the basic problem is that __generic_file_aio_write will always
>return 0 after device removal, yes? I'm not sure why that's a real
>issue, can you explain exactly why you're trying to change this?
>
At prenset, the __generic_file_aio_write don't return zero rather that the wanted size.
So the user can't know the disk removed.
For example:
dd if=/dev/zero of=usb-disk bs=64k
When removed usb-disk, dd stoped until reached the endof usb-disk.
Using this patch, after removed disk, the aio-write will return zero.I think the upper user will check.
(or if the size of block is zero, we return -ENOSPC).
>As for your patches, I don't think that putting the i_size_write into
>invalidate_partitions is a good idea. Consider the case of rescanning
>partitions: you will always detect a size change now, which is not good.
>
Yes.But in func rescan_partitions, after invalidate_partitions it will call check_disk_size_change to set size of block_device.
Thanks!
Jianpeng Ma
>Cheers,
>Jeff
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
To: "Jeff Moyer" <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Auto stop async-write on block device when device removed.
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:07:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309241107330800706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x49r4cfy4py.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312", Size: 1554 bytes --]
>majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> For async-write on block device,if device removed,but the vfs don't know it.
>> It will continue to do.
>> Patch1 set size of inode of block device to zero when removed disk.By this,vfs know
>> disk changed.
>> Path2 add size-check on blk_aio_write.If pos of write larger than size of inode,it will
>> return zero.So the user can check disk state.
>
>OK, so the basic problem is that __generic_file_aio_write will always
>return 0 after device removal, yes? I'm not sure why that's a real
>issue, can you explain exactly why you're trying to change this?
>
At prenset, the __generic_file_aio_write don't return zero rather that the wanted size.
So the user can't know the disk removed.
For example:
dd if=/dev/zero of=usb-disk bs=64k
When removed usb-disk, dd stoped until reached the endof usb-disk.
Using this patch, after removed disk, the aio-write will return zero.I think the upper user will check.
(or if the size of block is zero, we return -ENOSPC).
>As for your patches, I don't think that putting the i_size_write into
>invalidate_partitions is a good idea. Consider the case of rescanning
>partitions: you will always detect a size change now, which is not good.
>
Yes.But in func rescan_partitions, after invalidate_partitions it will call check_disk_size_change to set size of block_device.
Thanks!
Jianpeng Ma
>Cheers,
>Jeffÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 3:21 [PATCH V2 0/2] Auto stop async-write on block device when device removed majianpeng
2013-09-17 3:21 ` majianpeng
2013-09-23 14:47 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-09-24 3:07 ` majianpeng [this message]
2013-09-24 3:07 ` majianpeng
2013-09-24 13:54 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-09-25 1:32 ` majianpeng
2013-09-25 1:32 ` majianpeng
2013-09-25 15:44 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-09-29 8:46 ` majianpeng
2013-09-29 8:46 ` majianpeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309241107330800706@gmail.com \
--to=majianpeng@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.