From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <joe@perches.com>, <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <gospo@redhat.com>,
<sassmann@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [net 5/6] i40e: better return values
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:09:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924120906.00000efe@unknown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130924.101231.1193830264265403478.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:12:31 -0400
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > Ick. post_increment problem.
> >
> > return ++num_tc;
> >
> > There's nothing wrong with the original code
> > unless this is a bugfix which should be documented
> > better than "better return values".
>
> Agreed, this style of coding is asking for a bug.
>
> If you want to return "num_tc PLUS ONE" just say that:
>
> return num_tc + 1;
Oops! Obviously the original post-inc was not the intent. That was my
bad. good catch Joe! will fix and resubmit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 9:45 [net 0/6][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2013-09-24 9:45 ` [net 1/6] igb: Fix ethtool loopback test for 82580 copper Jeff Kirsher
2013-09-24 9:45 ` [net 2/6] i40e: use common failure flow Jeff Kirsher
2013-09-24 9:45 ` [net 3/6] i40e: small clean ups from review Jeff Kirsher
2013-09-24 9:45 ` [net 4/6] i40e: convert ret to aq_ret Jeff Kirsher
2013-09-24 9:45 ` [net 5/6] i40e: better return values Jeff Kirsher
2013-09-24 11:34 ` Joe Perches
2013-09-24 14:12 ` David Miller
2013-09-24 19:09 ` Jesse Brandeburg [this message]
2013-09-24 9:45 ` [net 6/6] i40e: clean up coccicheck reported errors Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130924120906.00000efe@unknown \
--to=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.