From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429AC60EDA for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id m15so5086371wgh.7 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=FNdHa4dsPTD6rcxgA5+FshfO24t6rhBeugUetkjlKw4=; b=hStabMUvLhioeblE17TU2F57EY+I8PzVN1msLXzbuBIX1snPtvyUPwspaAsnyemEkY Lsq0oq4CvNqc1pQKpSWPg4o+5FKZRGBF45Eyb+AqnBicJUXYzHSjIGluJPZgmHNl/64Y 3XdGK5JQDGY8w1cnRvVAEAt5AQMw8nDuYFT6jmdH5sjCprc0rlyS/V4IUFuS+TuZhJ7d guHw/N2GxsMNOJpFingudUc9/6Dqf3w+Fn9t3MSpyZOADhhQl5upHhiEeYVEmbG/UGnr SIT0sf0rb6eSqY9RaYHa+WXbMLz1n/GIo4YgSi5WD86ss4dHdJl1KoLl3K7odzwsqj3R J7aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnw2MWL08AA/lVmWhDqhVVqz6+EVLjZzUPpfG5vkXTOOPMwn6PF0PZRJ1d5Rc4be91+ZF9 X-Received: by 10.194.109.68 with SMTP id hq4mr23478914wjb.12.1380046228471; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deserted.net ([128.224.252.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm9921054wiy.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:10:22 -0400 From: Joe MacDonald To: Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <20130924181019.GA23080@deserted.net> References: <1379927191-21769-1-git-send-email-b40290@freescale.com> <10075581.zIxvIPmXvh@helios> <20130923182159.GA30829@deserted.net> <62747590.0CPS7u3973@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <62747590.0CPS7u3973@helios> X-URL: http://github.com/joeythesaint/joe-s-common-environment/tree/master X-Configuration: git://github.com/joeythesaint/joe-s-common-environment.git X-Editor: Vim-703 http://www.vim.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-networking][PATCH 1/3] snort: add recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:10:29 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 46343 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 1/3] snort: add recipe] On 13.09.24 (Tue = 18:16) Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Joe, >=20 > On Monday 23 September 2013 14:22:02 Joe MacDonald wrote: > > [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 1/3] snort: add recipe] On 13.09.23 (= Mon > > 18:56) Paul Eggleton wrote: > > >=20 > > > I'm a bit confused; is this recipe supposed to be going into > > > meta-networking or meta-security? Because patches have been sent > > > recently to add it to both. > >=20 > > I had mentioned that I would accept snort into meta-networking if it > > wasn't a good fit for meta-security since it was something I'd started > > working on integrating anyway a while back. I assumed that was the case > > since it was sent to the list for meta-networking today. > >=20 > > I don't think we need copies in both places, though, and since it was > > first aimed at meta-security, if it gets merged there, I won't merge it > > here. > >=20 > > Hopefully nothing I've said here contradicts what the meta-security > > maintainers would want to see. >=20 > I would have thought it would go into meta-security myself; but ultimatel= y=20 > it's up to you and Saul really. I just wanted to make sure we didn't some= how=20 > end up with it in both layers since we have patches for adding it to both. Yeah, I completely agree. Since I'm using meta-security a bit now and sending a few patches back, I'll keep an eye out and if the snort stuff lands in there, I would not consider merging it with meta-networking. Snort has always been in the same category for me as tcpdump, nmap and etherape/wireshark. A hugely useful network diagnostics tool. But as and IDS / IPS it makes sense for meta-security as well. Either works for me. --=20 -Joe MacDonald. :wq --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJB1XkACgkQwFvcllog0XweZQCdFnZjF8ePzVTCvvwHU58pllkh gM4AnjQbQkzDHIsK+lbkuokD0ceRv5fw =zgkt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--