From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07536E01307 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (unknown [82.233.81.124]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1639B4B00E4; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:40:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:40:39 +0200 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <20130924204039.1bb55bf8@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: References: <1379966158-18179-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1379966158-18179-2-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <20130924010445.45f71815@e6520eb> <20130924190212.598a59df@e6520eb> <20130924201601.13651713@e6520eb> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 01/23] fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass: Dynamically set package architecture X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:40:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:26:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador a =E9crit : > >> > What is the cost on the build/parse time to have this code running > >> > dynamicaly ? > >> > > >> > While at it : why does qt4 depends on virtual/kernel ? > >> > That's quite annoying as it seems qt gets rebuilt everytime we make a > >> > change to the kernel. > >> > >> It uses kernel headers and do syscalls for mxcfb. I am open for an > >> advise how to make this better. > >> > > maybe we could include the linux/mxcfb.h in the patch as these 2 > > ioctls and the 2 struct have little chance to change ? >=20 > The problem here is it is included in the kernel. Can you submit a bug > in bugzilla about this? So I can use this to collect the information. >=20 > We have this in more places, not just Qt, and it'd help a lot so I > will try to think on a generic solution for this. >=20 why not having a mxc-header package built from the generic Freescale kernel so that the software depending on the headers are not impacted by any kernel change ? Eric