All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct.
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:57:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925155700.GA6760@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524303CE.2060404@citrix.com>

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:39:58PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/09/13 16:29, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > We do the microcode code update in two steps - the presmp:
> >  'microcode_presmp_init' and when CPUs are brought up:
> > 'microcode_init'. The earlier performs the microcode update
> > on the BSP - but unfortunately it does not check whether the
> > update failed. Which means that we might try later to update
> > a incorrect payload on the rest of CPUs.
> >
> > This patch handles this odd situation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > [v2: Redid it as we are not doing scan and <index> at the same time]

.. snip..
> 
> coding style.
> 
> Once fixed, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Here it is. Thank you for your time looking at the patch!

>From eac253b28a6818ec9816526f420089bbefb29c7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 23:44:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct.

We do the microcode code update in two steps - the presmp:
 'microcode_presmp_init' and when CPUs are brought up:
'microcode_init'. The earlier performs the microcode update
on the BSP - but unfortunately it does not check whether the
update failed. Which means that we might try later to update
a incorrect payload on the rest of CPUs.

This patch handles this odd situation.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
[v2: Redid it as we are not doing scan and <index> at the same time]
[v3: Fixed coding style, else was not on its own line]
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
index e6344cf..091d5d1 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ static int __init microcode_presmp_init(void)
         {
             void *data;
             size_t len;
+            int rc = 0;
 
             if ( ucode_blob.size )
             {
@@ -430,10 +431,24 @@ static int __init microcode_presmp_init(void)
                 data = ucode_mod_map(&ucode_mod);
             }
             if ( data )
-                microcode_update_cpu(data, len);
+                rc = microcode_update_cpu(data, len);
+            else
+                rc = -ENOMEM;
 
             if ( !ucode_blob.size )
                 ucode_mod_map(NULL);
+
+            if ( rc )
+            {
+                if ( ucode_blob.size )
+                {
+                    xfree(ucode_blob.data);
+                    ucode_blob.size = 0;
+                    ucode_blob.data = NULL;
+                }
+                else
+                    ucode_mod.mod_end = 0;
+            }
         }
 
         register_cpu_notifier(&microcode_percpu_nfb);
-- 
1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-25 15:29 [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3.2) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] microcode: Scan the initramfs payload for microcode blob Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 16:02   ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-25 16:43     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-26  6:31       ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-25 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 15:39   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-09-25 15:57     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-09-26  8:19 ` [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3.2) Jan Beulich
2013-09-26 15:04   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-27  1:09 [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3.3) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-27  1:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 12:57 [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 13:13   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-09-25 13:59     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 14:10       ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130925155700.GA6760@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.