All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux.nics@intel.com,
	"e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kobject_add_internal failed for msi_irqs with -EEXIST
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:00:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131001130046.GC6096@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5245D626.6090209@redhat.com>

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:01:58PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>Dne 27.9.2013 18:01, Veaceslav Falico napsal(a):
>>On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:58:28AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>[+cc Veaceslav, linux-pci]
>>>
>>>On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>Hi
>>>>
>>>>With recent build of 3.12-rc2 I'm getting this warning report from kernel:
>>>>(hw Lenovo T61, C2D, 4GB Ram)
>>>>(repost since linux-kernel@ rejected my gmail email....)
>>>
>>>This looks related to the MSI/kobject issues Veaceslav is working on.
>>>See
>>>http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1379382464-7920-2-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com
>>>and related messages.
>>>
>>>We don't have a resolution yet.  If you have
>>>CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y, you could try turning that off.  I
>>>don't know if it would help, and it would only be a temporary
>>>workaround anyway.
>>
>>I've looked at the original post -
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg510798.html
>>hope that's it - and it seems that it's disabling DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
>>won't help - the warning is about the re-registering, not about freeing it.
>>
>>As a workaround I'd suggest adding some kind of delay between removing and
>>adding the msi - as in - rmmod e1000e; sleep 1; modprobe e1000e; - or
>>something like that, so that there is enough time for the /msqi_irqs/ to go
>>away.
>>
>
>I'm not readding e1000e modules myself - however I've no idea what 
>NetworkManager does. Here are messages prior warning:
>
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> monitoring kernel firmware directory '/lib/firmware'.
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> rfkill1: found WiFi radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:03:00.0/ieee80211/phy0/rfkill1) 
>(driver iwl3945)
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> WiFi hardware radio set enabled
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> WiFi enabled by radio killswitch; enabled 
>by state file
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> WWAN enabled by radio killswitch; 
>disabled by state file
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> WiMAX enabled by radio killswitch; 
>enabled by state file
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> Networking is enabled by state file
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> (eth0): carrier is OFF
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> (eth0): new Ethernet device (driver: 
>'e1000e' ifindex: 2)
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> (eth0): exported as 
>/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> (eth0): device state change: unmanaged -> 
>unavailable (reason 'managed') [10 20 2]
>NetworkManager[304]: <info> (eth0): bringing up device.
>rpcbind: cannot create socket for udp6
>rpcbind: cannot create socket for tcp6
>kernel: [    5.727025] WARNING! power/level is deprecated; use 
>power/control instead
>
>
>So it looks like  'bringing up' causes recreation of msi_irqs ?

Yep, seems like that. .ndo_stop() (e1000_close(), which removes msi irqs
and the /msi_irqs/ kset) instantly followed by .ndo_open() (e1000_open(),
which enables the requested msi irqs via pci_enable_msi() - and,
consequently, re-creates the /msi_irqs/ kset) triggers it - because the
kset, in the meanwhile, isn't freed - maybe because of some readers, maybe
because of the delay introduced by DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE.

I'm now slowly fighting this (and adjacent) issues, will put you on CC if
I'll come up with patches.

In the meanwhile - can you please try disabling DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE and
test if you see the warning _constantly_?

Cause if you do - we might have another issue here...

>
>Zdenek
>
>
>
>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2013-10-01 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-27 13:34 kobject_add_internal failed for msi_irqs with -EEXIST Zdenek Kabelac
2013-09-27 15:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-09-27 16:01   ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-27 19:01     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2013-10-01 13:00       ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131001130046.GC6096@redhat.com \
    --to=vfalico@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux.nics@intel.com \
    --cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.