All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf tests: Test converting perf time to TSC
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:02:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131003110224.GD3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524D4359.2060801@intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:13:45PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > Anyway; looking at this, why does time_zero have these different checks
> > from the other time bits?
> > 
> > @@ -1897,6 +1898,11 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event_mmap_page *userpg, u64 now)
> >         userpg->time_mult = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns);
> >         userpg->time_shift = CYC2NS_SCALE_FACTOR;
> >         userpg->time_offset = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns_offset) - now;
> > +
> > +       if (sched_clock_stable && !check_tsc_disabled()) {
> > +               userpg->cap_usr_time_zero = 1;
> > +               userpg->time_zero = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns_offset);
> > +       }
> >  }
> > 
> > That doesn't make any kind of sense.. why is cyc2ns_offset differently
> > tested from cyc2ns itself?
> 
> I am afraid I don't understand the scaling calculations
> so I don't know if they make any sense.
> 
> cap_usr_time_zero (now cap_user_time_zero) means you can convert
> perf time to / from TSC.  That only works if TSC is not disabled
> and sched_clock is stable (and you have constant, non-stop TSC)
> 
> As far as I can tell, assuming the hardware is not broken,
> sched_clock will be stable unless something (BIOS) or someone
> (meddling user) has changed TSC manually.

Well all the scaling mess only applies to TSC.. furthermore note how
time_offset even uses cyc2ns_offset.

So I don't see any point in cap_user_time and cap_user_time_zero having
different conditions.

Also, I don't think that a cpu without cap_tsc will ever run perf code
so I don't see the point of testing tsc_disabled; if someone is mad
enough to boot with that he can bloody well keep the pieces.

Arguably the CONSTANT && NONSTOP test was to test the same thing as
sched_clock_stable, but I suppose we can use that.

Which reminds me; I should go and fix the transition for
sched_clock_stable: 1->0.

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 897783b3302a..9db2b361a63d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1888,21 +1888,16 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event_mmap_page *userpg, u64 now)
 	userpg->cap_user_rdpmc = x86_pmu.attr_rdpmc;
 	userpg->pmc_width = x86_pmu.cntval_bits;
 
-	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
-		return;
-
-	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC))
-		return;
+	if (!sched_clock_stable)
+		return
 
 	userpg->cap_user_time = 1;
 	userpg->time_mult = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns);
 	userpg->time_shift = CYC2NS_SCALE_FACTOR;
 	userpg->time_offset = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns_offset) - now;
 
-	if (sched_clock_stable && !check_tsc_disabled()) {
-		userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
-		userpg->time_zero = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns_offset);
-	}
+	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
+	userpg->time_zero = this_cpu_read(cyc2ns_offset);
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-03 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-02 13:23 [BUG] perf tests: Test converting perf time to TSC Jiri Olsa
2013-10-02 13:46 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-10-02 16:14   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-10-03  8:17   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-03  8:42     ` Adrian Hunter
2013-10-03  8:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03  8:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03  9:54           ` Adrian Hunter
2013-10-03  9:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 10:13         ` Adrian Hunter
2013-10-03 11:02           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-03 11:49             ` Adrian Hunter
2013-10-03 13:57               ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131003110224.GD3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.