From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [pchecks v2 2/2] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:55:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131003135510.GJ28601@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131003072100.GA5775@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:21:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> It was important to me and other maintainers as well back then and today
> as well, as me and others complained about it out numerous times.
I can testify to that; the lack of these preemption checks have wasted
hours of my and Thomas' time, probably others as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130924154159.855373283@linux.com>
2013-09-24 15:41 ` [pchecks v2 1/2] Subject; percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24 15:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24 15:41 ` [pchecks v2 2/2] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24 15:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-24 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-25 16:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-25 18:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 13:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-09-28 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-03 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 15:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-03 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-03 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-03 14:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-03 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-03 15:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-03 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <20131003182902.174251532@linux.com>
2013-10-03 18:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-04 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-04 15:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-04 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131003135510.GJ28601@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.