From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:41:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131003164117.GD5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002150518.675931976@infradead.org>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:56:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
> It is functionally equivalent to
>
> struct xxx_struct {
> atomic_t counter;
> };
>
> static inline bool xxx_is_idle(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
> {
> return atomic_read(&xxx->counter) == 0;
> }
>
> static inline void xxx_enter(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
> {
> atomic_inc(&xxx->counter);
> synchronize_sched();
> }
>
> static inline void xxx_enter(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
> {
> synchronize_sched();
> atomic_dec(&xxx->counter);
> }
>
> except: it records the state and synchronize_sched() is only called by
> xxx_enter() and only if necessary.
Could you please make the "xxx_" above match the prefix below?
One comment below for the code's self-defense.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130929183634.GA15563@redhat.com
> ---
> include/linux/rcusync.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/Makefile | 3 -
> kernel/rcusync.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +#define _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +
> +struct rcu_sync_struct {
> + int gp_state;
> + int gp_count;
> + wait_queue_head_t gp_wait;
> +
> + int cb_state;
> + struct rcu_head cb_head;
> +
> + void (*sync)(void);
> + void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
> +};
> +
> +#define ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) \
> + .gp_state = 0, \
> + .gp_count = 0, \
> + .gp_wait = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.gp_wait), \
> + .cb_state = 0
> +
> +#define __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
> + ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
> + .sync = synchronize_sched, \
> + .call = call_rcu_sched, \
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
> + ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
> + .sync = synchronize_rcu_bh, \
> + .call = call_rcu_bh, \
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
> + ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
> + .sync = synchronize_rcu, \
> + .call = call_rcu, \
> +}
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SCHED_SYNC(name) \
> + struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_BH_SYNC(name) \
> + struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SYNC(name) \
> + struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
It would be nice to validate that we are in the corresponding type of
RCU read-side critical section, but I would hate to pay a function call
through a pointer for this if !PROVE_RCU. But even more, I would hate
rare bugs due to someone forgetting an rcu_read_lock().
How about the something like the following, where ->read_side_check()
gets rcu_read_lock_held(), rcu_read_lock_bh_held(), or
rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), as appropriate?
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
#define rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss) BUG_ON(!rss->read_side_check())
#else
#define rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss) do { } while (0)
#endif
rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss);
> + return !rss->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */
> +}
> +
> +enum rcu_sync_type { RCU_SYNC, RCU_SCHED_SYNC, RCU_BH_SYNC };
> +
> +extern void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *, enum rcu_sync_type);
> +extern void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +extern void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_ */
> +
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ obj-y = fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o
> kthread.o wait.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \
> hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o srcu.o semaphore.o \
> notifier.o ksysfs.o cred.o reboot.o \
> - async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o
> + async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o \
> + rcusync.o
>
> ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> # Do not trace debug files and internal ftrace files
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/rcusync.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +
> +#include <linux/rcusync.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +
> +enum { GP_IDLE = 0, GP_PENDING, GP_PASSED };
> +enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY };
> +
> +#define rss_lock gp_wait.lock
> +
> +void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss, enum rcu_sync_type type)
> +{
> + memset(rss, 0, sizeof(*rss));
> + init_waitqueue_head(&rss->gp_wait);
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case RCU_SYNC:
> + rss->sync = synchronize_rcu;
> + rss->call = call_rcu;
> + break;
> +
> + case RCU_SCHED_SYNC:
> + rss->sync = synchronize_sched;
> + rss->call = call_rcu_sched;
> + break;
> +
> + case RCU_BH_SYNC:
> + rss->sync = synchronize_rcu_bh;
> + rss->call = call_rcu_bh;
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> + bool need_wait, need_sync;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> + need_wait = rss->gp_count++;
> + need_sync = rss->gp_state == GP_IDLE;
> + if (need_sync)
> + rss->gp_state = GP_PENDING;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +
> + BUG_ON(need_wait && need_sync);
> +
> + if (need_sync) {
> + rss->sync();
> + rss->gp_state = GP_PASSED;
> + wake_up_all(&rss->gp_wait);
> + } else if (need_wait) {
> + wait_event(rss->gp_wait, rss->gp_state == GP_PASSED);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Possible when there's a pending CB from a rcu_sync_exit().
> + * Nobody has yet been allowed the 'fast' path and thus we can
> + * avoid doing any sync(). The callback will get 'dropped'.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void rcu_sync_func(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +{
> + struct rcu_sync_struct *rss =
> + container_of(rcu, struct rcu_sync_struct, cb_head);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> +
> + BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
> + BUG_ON(rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> + if (rss->gp_count) {
> + /*
> + * A new rcu_sync_begin() has happened; drop the callback.
> + */
> + rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> + } else if (rss->cb_state == CB_REPLAY) {
> + /*
> + * A new rcu_sync_exit() has happened; requeue the callback
> + * to catch a later GP.
> + */
> + rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> + rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * We're at least a GP after rcu_sync_exit(); eveybody will now
> + * have observed the write side critical section. Let 'em rip!.
> + */
> + rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> + rss->gp_state = GP_IDLE;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> + spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> + if (!--rss->gp_count) {
> + if (rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE) {
> + rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> + rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> + } else if (rss->cb_state == CB_PENDING) {
> + rss->cb_state = CB_REPLAY;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +}
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 14:56 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 16:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-10-03 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 19:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 20:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 21:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 11:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 7:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 11:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 11:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 12:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 13:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 15:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 19:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-05 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 7:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 20:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-04 7:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] hotplug: Optimize cpu_hotplug_{begin,done}() using rcu_sync Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 18:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131003164117.GD5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.