From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753629Ab3JDCoH (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:44:07 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60063 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751957Ab3JDCoA (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:44:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:37:52 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review Message-ID: <20131004023752.GB3417@kroah.com> References: <20131003040400.753642257@linuxfoundation.org> <524E08D4.9090405@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <524E08D4.9090405@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > >There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > > Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings > and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly. > > Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 > Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed > Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed > dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions > compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, > alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Thanks for testing both of these, sorry for the mess with -rc2. greg k-h